Most students debate on whether it is good to conclude an essay with a question. Some think that it is a good idea since it will engage the reader while others think that it is totally a bad idea. Despite the contrasting views, there is really no harm in concluding your essay with a question as long as you use it in the right way. If used the right way, a question can be an effective tool for engaging your reader and by involving them in the topic that you were discussing.
Please read that instead. Your friends and colleagues are talking about something called "Bayes' Theorem" or "Bayes' Rule", or something called Bayesian reasoning.
They sound really enthusiastic about it, too, so you google and find a webpage about Bayes' Theorem and The page you found gives a definition of it, but it doesn't say what it is, or why it's useful, or why your friends would be interested in it.
It looks like this random statistics thing. So you came here. Maybe you don't understand what the equation says. Maybe your friends are all wearing Bayes' Theorem T-shirts, and you're feeling left out.
Maybe you're a girl looking for a boyfriend, but the boy you're interested in refuses to date anyone who "isn't Bayesian".
What matters is that Bayes is cool, and if you don't know Bayes, you aren't cool. Why does a mathematical concept generate this strange enthusiasm in its students? What is the so-called Bayesian Revolution now sweeping through the sciences, which claims to subsume even the experimental method itself as a special case?
What is the secret that the adherents of Bayes know? What is the light that they have seen?
Soon you will know. Soon you will be one of us. While there are a few existing online explanations of Bayes' Theorem, my experience with trying to introduce people to Bayesian reasoning is that the existing online explanations are too abstract.
Bayesian reasoning is very counterintuitive. People do not employ Bayesian reasoning intuitively, find it very difficult to learn Bayesian reasoning when tutored, and rapidly forget Bayesian methods once the tutoring is over. This holds equally true for novice students and highly trained professionals in a field.
Bayesian reasoning is apparently one of those things which, like quantum mechanics or the Wason Selection Test, is inherently difficult for humans to grasp with our built-in mental faculties.
Or so they claim.
Here you will find an attempt to offer an intuitive explanation of Bayesian reasoning - an excruciatingly gentle introduction that invokes all the human ways of grasping numbers, from natural frequencies to spatial visualization.
The intent is to convey, not abstract rules for manipulating numbers, but what the numbers mean, and why the rules are what they are and cannot possibly be anything else. When you are finished reading this page, you will see Bayesian problems in your dreams.
Here's a story problem about a situation that doctors often encounter: A woman in this age group had a positive mammography in a routine screening.What Happens at the End of Infinite Jest? (or, the Infinite Jest ending explained) Herb: Is there no “ending” to “Infinite Book” because there couldn’t be?
Ending An Essay- Is It A Good Idea To End And Essay With A Question? Is It Good To End An Essay With A Question? Most students debate on whether it is good to conclude an essay with a question. Some think that it is a good idea since it will engage the reader while others think that .
The correct answer is %, obtained as follows: Out of 10, women, have breast cancer; 80 of those have positive mammographies. From the same 10, women, 9, will not have breast cancer and of those 9, women, will also get positive mammographies.
Turnitin provides instructors with the tools to prevent plagiarism, engage students in the writing process, and provide personalized feedback.
That question could be at the end of the ethnicity paragraph or at the beginning of the religion paragraph. If a question works well, that can be a good variation for a bridge statement.
An examination of the possibilities for libertarian feminism, taking the feminist thought of the 19th century radical individualists as an example and a guide. We find that the radical libertarian critique of statism and the radical feminist critique of patriarchy are complementary, not contradictory, and we discuss some of the confusions that lead many libertarians--including many libertarian.